Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zhenghua Xiao vs Sara Milanese Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Xiao vs Milanese analysis and find out who is favored!
Zhenghua Xiao vs Sara Milanese Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Xiao 1 - 0 Milanese
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Xiao has won 43.36% of points on their second serve, while Milanese has won 41.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Xiao, in recent form, has won 55.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Milanese has won 56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 36.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Xiao has saved 52.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Milanese has saved 45.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Xiao has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 14/ 18), with Milanese winning 37.93% (W/L 11/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Xiao has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Milanese has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Xiao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12), where as Milanese has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 8/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Xiao winning 1 times and Milanese being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Xiao winning 2 and Milanese winning 0. The last match between Xiao and Milanese was at the W15 Monastir, 13-05-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Zhenghua Xiao getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Xiao and Milanese have played a deciding set 0 times, with Xiao winning 0 times and Milanese 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Xiao winning 0, and Milanese 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Xiao has played against opponents with an average rank of 113.03 while Milanese has played against players with an average rank of 106.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Xiao has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Milanese has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Xiao has converted 35.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Milanese has converted 66.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
805
Rank
805
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
47% (36-41)
Career Total W/L
53% (31-28)
48% (12-13)
YTD W/L
46% (6-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Zhenghua Xiao vs Sara Milanese For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Xiao VS Milanese
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Zhenghua Xiao | Sara Milanese |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zhenghua Xiao | Sara Milanese |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (12/13) | 46% (6/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (26/28) | 46% (13/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (241/236) | 48% (130/141) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 48% (12/13) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 80.96 | 74.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (474/813) | 67% (289/429) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (275/474) | 56% (162/289) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (147/339) | 41% (58/140) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (31/88) | 67% (22/33) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (368/883) | 43% (154/358) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (11/11) | 45% (5/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (12/25) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Zhenghua Xiao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Zixuan Zeng
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhenghua Xiao
Player
Yanni Liu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhenghua Xiao
Player
Talia Neilson Gatenby
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
114)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhenghua Xiao
Player
Ying Zhang
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 1-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ella Mcdonald
Player
Zhenghua Xiao
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Sara Milanese Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jiayu Xu
Player
Sara Milanese
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 2-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Sara Milanese
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pemra Ozgen
Player
Sara Milanese
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Sara Milanese
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Milanese
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Xiao Vs Milanese Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Xiao are available here and Milanese photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
